Ethics Review Board
Transform ethics from reactive committee to proactive strategic function
8
Pending Reviews24
Approved (Month)3
Rejected (Month)7
Conditional9
Board Members4 days
Avg Review TimeActive Ethics Reviews
Credit Scoring Algorithm v3.0
Ethical Considerations
• Potential bias against protected groups
• Transparency of decision factors
• Right to explanation compliance
Impact Assessment
Affects ~50,000 loan applications monthlyReview Progress
Assigned Reviewers
Healthcare Diagnosis Assistant
Ethical Considerations
• Patient safety implications
• Equity in healthcare access
• Data privacy concerns
Impact Assessment
Clinical decision support for 100+ hospitalsReview Progress
Assigned Reviewers
Employee Performance Predictor
Ethical Considerations
• Workplace discrimination risks
• Employee privacy
• Psychological impact
Impact Assessment
Evaluates 10,000+ employeesReview Progress
Assigned Reviewers
Ethics Review Board Members
Dr. Sarah Chen
Chair, Ethics Board142
Prof. Michael Johnson
External Advisor89
Lisa Wang
Legal Counsel113
Dr. James Smith
Technical Expert67
Ethical Principles & Scoring Framework
Ethical Assessment Criteria
| Principle | Description | Weight | Threshold | Current Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairness | Equal treatment across demographics | 25% | ≥ 80 | 92 |
| Transparency | Explainable decisions | 20% | ≥ 75 | 88 |
| Privacy | Data protection and consent | 20% | ≥ 85 | 91 |
| Accountability | Clear responsibility chain | 15% | ≥ 80 | 85 |
| Safety | Harm prevention | 20% | ≥ 90 | 94 |
Ethical Score Distribution
Overall Ethics Rating
Recent Board Decisions
Customer Churn Predictor
Meets all ethical standards with strong fairness metrics
Vote: 7-0 | Review Time: 3 daysFacial Recognition System
Insufficient bias mitigation for protected groups
Vote: 2-5 | Review Time: 5 daysRisk Assessment Tool
Approved with mandatory monitoring requirements
Conditions:• Monthly fairness audits required
• Implement additional explainability features
• Quarterly board review for 1 year