Build and Pilot
Track the focused implementation of the first three QAG pillars on a selected pilot model with measurable success metrics
Three Pillars Implementation Status for Credit Risk Scoring Pilot
Pillar 1: Quantified Risk
Dynamic risk scoring with calibrated metrics for the pilot model
Current Risk Score:
Pillar 2: Automated Guardrails
Policy-as-Code implementation with pre-deployment and in-production gates
Gates Passed:
Pillar 3: Centralized Observability
Single source of truth dashboard with audit trails and explainability
Dashboard Views:
Pilot Success Metrics & KPI Tracking
| KPI Category | Metric Name | Baseline | Current Value | Target | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Reduction | Model Risk Score Reduction | 8.2 | 4.8 | > 40% | Exceeded | |
| Risk Reduction | Violation Detection Time (MTTD) | 2-3 weeks | 18 hours | < 24 hours | Achieved | |
| Risk Reduction | Audit Preparation Time | 40 hours | 1.5 hours | < 2 hours | Exceeded | |
| Efficiency Gains | Model Deployment Velocity | 12 weeks | 8 weeks | > 30% reduction | On Track | |
| Efficiency Gains | Governance Automation Rate | 5% | 78% | > 80% | Near Target | |
| Efficiency Gains | Manual Intervention Rate | 20/week | 3/week | < 5/week | Achieved | |
| Value Creation | Model Uptime/Reliability | 94.2% | 99.7% | 99.9% | On Track | |
| Value Creation | Stakeholder Confidence Index | 6.1 | 8.9 | > 2 point increase | Exceeded |
Pilot Health Score
8.4
Out of 10.0 (Excellent Progress)
Risk Reduction
42%
Deployment Velocity
35%
Governance Automation
78%
Stakeholder Confidence
+2.8 pts
Technical Implementation Status
Risk Metrics Implemented
Demographic Parity (< 0.05)
Equality of Opportunity (< 0.08)
KL Divergence (< 0.1)
PSI Monitoring (< 0.1)
SHAP Explainability (> 0.85)
Adversarial Robustness (> 0.9)
Automated Guardrails Active
| Guardrail Type | Threshold | Status | Last Triggered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fairness Check | DP < 0.05 | Active |
Never |
| Performance Gate | AUC > 0.85 | Active |
3 days ago |
| Data Drift Monitor | PSI < 0.1 | Active |
1 week ago |
| Circuit Breaker | Risk Score > 7.0 | Testing |
Not deployed |
| Explainability Gate | SHAP Fidelity > 0.85 | Pending |
Not active |
Stakeholder Feedback & Organizational Buy-in
Executive Leadership
Confidence Score: 8.7/10
"Impressed with quantifiable risk reduction and faster deployment cycles. Ready to approve Phase 3 scaling."
- CFO, based on ROI demonstrationRisk & Compliance
Satisfaction Score: 9.2/10
"Audit preparation time reduced from 40 hours to 90 minutes. Automated compliance checks are game-changing."
- Chief Risk OfficerData Science & MLOps
Adoption Score: 7.4/10
"Initial friction with new validation gates, but appreciate automated feedback and clearer guidelines."
- Lead Data Scientist feedbackBusiness Unit (Financial Services)
Value Score: 8.9/10
"Model performance improved 12% while maintaining regulatory compliance. Requesting expansion to other models."
- VP Financial ServicesPhase 3 Preparation: Enterprise-Wide Scaling Readiness
Key Lessons Learned
Automated gates reduce manual overhead by 75%
Early stakeholder engagement critical for adoption
Need stronger change management for data scientists
Optimization Opportunities
Fine-tune bias detection thresholds
Accelerate explainability implementation
Enhance MLOps pipeline integration
Expand team training programs
Phase 3 Scaling Strategy
Wave 1: High-Risk Models
23 models identified, 6-month rolloutWave 2: Core Business Functions
89 models, automated onboardingWave 3: Full Portfolio
All 247 models, governance-by-design