Build and Pilot

Track the focused implementation of the first three QAG pillars on a selected pilot model with measurable success metrics

Phase 2: Month 7 of 6
Pilot Implementation: 83% Complete
Three Pillars Implementation Status for Credit Risk Scoring Pilot
Pillar 1: Quantified Risk
95% Complete

Dynamic risk scoring with calibrated metrics for the pilot model

Risk Taxonomy Setup
Metrics Calibration
Dynamic Scoring
RAG Status Integration

Current Risk Score:

6.2 (Amber)
Pillar 2: Automated Guardrails
87% Complete

Policy-as-Code implementation with pre-deployment and in-production gates

Policy-as-Code Engine
Pre-Deployment Gates
Circuit Breakers
Guardian Agents

Gates Passed:

5/7 Active
Pillar 3: Centralized Observability
78% Complete

Single source of truth dashboard with audit trails and explainability

Model Inventory
Governance Dashboard
Audit Trail System
Explainability Layer

Dashboard Views:

4/6 Live
Pilot Success Metrics & KPI Tracking
KPI Category Metric Name Baseline Current Value Target Progress Status
Risk Reduction Model Risk Score Reduction 8.2 4.8 > 40%
Exceeded
Risk Reduction Violation Detection Time (MTTD) 2-3 weeks 18 hours < 24 hours
Achieved
Risk Reduction Audit Preparation Time 40 hours 1.5 hours < 2 hours
Exceeded
Efficiency Gains Model Deployment Velocity 12 weeks 8 weeks > 30% reduction
On Track
Efficiency Gains Governance Automation Rate 5% 78% > 80%
Near Target
Efficiency Gains Manual Intervention Rate 20/week 3/week < 5/week
Achieved
Value Creation Model Uptime/Reliability 94.2% 99.7% 99.9%
On Track
Value Creation Stakeholder Confidence Index 6.1 8.9 > 2 point increase
Exceeded
Pilot Health Score

8.4

Out of 10.0 (Excellent Progress)

Risk Reduction

42%

Exceeded Target

Deployment Velocity

35%

On Target

Governance Automation

78%

Near Target

Stakeholder Confidence

+2.8 pts

Strong Improvement
Technical Implementation Status

Risk Metrics Implemented

Demographic Parity (< 0.05)

Equality of Opportunity (< 0.08)

KL Divergence (< 0.1)

PSI Monitoring (< 0.1)

SHAP Explainability (> 0.85)

Adversarial Robustness (> 0.9)


Automated Guardrails Active

Guardrail Type Threshold Status Last Triggered
Fairness Check DP < 0.05
Active
Never
Performance Gate AUC > 0.85
Active
3 days ago
Data Drift Monitor PSI < 0.1
Active
1 week ago
Circuit Breaker Risk Score > 7.0
Testing
Not deployed
Explainability Gate SHAP Fidelity > 0.85
Pending
Not active
Stakeholder Feedback & Organizational Buy-in

Executive Leadership

Confidence Score: 8.7/10

"Impressed with quantifiable risk reduction and faster deployment cycles. Ready to approve Phase 3 scaling."

- CFO, based on ROI demonstration

Risk & Compliance

Satisfaction Score: 9.2/10

"Audit preparation time reduced from 40 hours to 90 minutes. Automated compliance checks are game-changing."

- Chief Risk Officer

Data Science & MLOps

Adoption Score: 7.4/10

"Initial friction with new validation gates, but appreciate automated feedback and clearer guidelines."

- Lead Data Scientist feedback

Business Unit (Financial Services)

Value Score: 8.9/10

"Model performance improved 12% while maintaining regulatory compliance. Requesting expansion to other models."

- VP Financial Services
Phase 3 Preparation: Enterprise-Wide Scaling Readiness

Key Lessons Learned

Automated gates reduce manual overhead by 75%

Early stakeholder engagement critical for adoption

Need stronger change management for data scientists

Optimization Opportunities

Fine-tune bias detection thresholds

Accelerate explainability implementation

Enhance MLOps pipeline integration

Expand team training programs

Phase 3 Scaling Strategy

Wave 1: High-Risk Models

23 models identified, 6-month rollout

Wave 2: Core Business Functions

89 models, automated onboarding

Wave 3: Full Portfolio

All 247 models, governance-by-design
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙